Today's hottest deals

MSI P67A-C43 (MS-7673)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7673
MotherboardMSI P67A-C43 (MS-7673)  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120801
Uptime11.9 Days
Run DateNov 22 '18 at 17:05
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 94.7
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 159
69% 113 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 419
45% 356 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.4% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 144
Parallax 133
100% 133 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 127
Splatting 105
93% 115 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
519GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 411 354 375 376 365 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 409
Mixed 400
SusWrite 379
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 41.8
145% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 366
276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
48GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 319 146 123 118 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 484
Write 424
Mixed 324
SusWrite 198
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 33.5
126% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 173
176% 287 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 1866 CL10 Series 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67A-C43 (MS-7673) Builds (Compare 314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI P67A-C43 (MS-7673) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $826
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback