Asus G751JT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus G751JT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G751JT
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '18 at 21:46
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 175
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 490
49% 396 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Asus(1043 22DA) 3GB
CLim: 1168 MHz, MLim: 1415 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38% Below average
Lighting 47.2
Reflection 47.4
Parallax 43
38% 45.9 fps
MRender 50
Gravity 45.1
Splatting 42.1
37% 45.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 224 214 206 200 194 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,207
Write 1,009
Mixed 683
SusWrite 240
174% 785 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 63.3
209% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 684
DQ Mixed 743
559% 749 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 162%
Great: 236%
Sandisk SD8TB8U512G1001 512GB
137GB free
Firmware: X4133101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 240 243 243 243 242 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.4% Good
Read 250
Write 239
Mixed 198
SusWrite 241
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 23.4
104% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 169
133% 185 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB M471B1G73DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.5% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.1
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 17.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G751JT Builds (Compare 640 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Asus G751JT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback