Lenovo 20351

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20351  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5A2
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150127
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 16 '16 at 16:03
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 67
1-Core 23
2-Core 43.2
32% 44.4 Pts
4-Core 75
8-Core 124
12% 99.4 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 380C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4380
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.12% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 3.58
Parallax 3.56
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 5.33
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.17
3% 3.58 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Goodram C40 240GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM08.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 466
Write 289
Mixed 361
82% 372 MB/s
4K Read 9.98
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 6.47
41% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 21.1
40% 79.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 RMT3170EF68F9W1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.1% Below average
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 13.5
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20351 Builds (Compare 1,808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20351

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback