bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH67CF
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '16 at 10:31
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 189
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 360
46% 346 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2600-PRO
Sapphire(174B E410) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.74% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.15
Parallax 1
2% 2.05 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 3.65
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.74%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 106
Write 103
Mixed 108
80% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.29
70% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 59%
Toshiba MK5076GSX 500GB-$54
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GS002D Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 64.1
Write 65.4
Mixed 61.7
48% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.26
61% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-405.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
52.8% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback