Acer Aspire E1-571

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-571  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HC_CR
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '18 at 22:42
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 161
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 405
45% 354 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 064B) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.8% Terrible
Lighting 4.17
Reflection 5.46
Parallax 2.84
3% 4.16 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.87
5% 5.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.8%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 137 142 143 142 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
48% Average
Read 311
Write 211
Mixed 209
SusWrite 158
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 21.5
81% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 17.1
DQ Write 34
DQ Mixed 19.4
16% 23.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
377GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 93 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 90.2
Write 87.7
Mixed 52
SusWrite 91.7
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/2G Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19B 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 14.7
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-571 Builds (Compare 684 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-571

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback