Acer Aspire E1-571G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-571G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HC_CR
Memory1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130311
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '17 at 13:58
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Memory 52.1
1-Core 31.8
2-Core 55.7
31% 46.5 Pts
4-Core 81.4
8-Core 157
14% 119 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 064B) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.16% Terrible
Lighting 2.37
Reflection 3.12
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.37 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.52
3% 3.02 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.16%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OA920 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 72.5
Write 77.7
Mixed 68.4
55% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.14
48% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/2G Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19B 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-571G Builds (Compare 466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-571G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback