Asrock X99 Extreme11

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive18.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme11  (all builds)
Memory19.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '18 at 13:30
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 172
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 532
52% 429 Pts
64-Core 824
51% 824 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 16 31 15 15 81 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.8% Very poor
Read 92.7
Write 95.7
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 30.1
17% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 10
42% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 14.8
DQ Write 16
DQ Mixed 14.5
11% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
2GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 134
Write 138
Mixed 21.1
71% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 176 179 176 182 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 112
Write 152
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 178
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.7
212% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBR 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
99.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 44.2
MC Mixed 35.9
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18.1
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme11 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme11

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $960
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback