Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X99-Phoenix SLI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics198% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-Phoenix SLI-CF  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '23 at 19:01
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$90
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 194
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 581
57% 465 Pts
64-Core 737
46% 737 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$500
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
198% Outstanding
Lighting 282
Reflection 266
Parallax 288
230% 278 fps
MRender 358
Gravity 243
Splatting 191
207% 264 fps
Poor: 161%
This bench: 198%
Great: 204%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 60 77 132 194 249 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 325
Write 32.9
Mixed 14.9
SusWrite 128
27% 125 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 17.4
28% 7.3 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C16-8GTZR F4-3000C16-8GTZR CMK64GX4M4A2400C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.1% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 12
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B7F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical GA-X99-Phoenix SLI-CF Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Phoenix SLI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $372
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback