Today's hottest deals

Notebook P65xHP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNotebook P65xHP  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P65xHP
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime15.4 Days
Run DateDec 10 '18 at 06:23
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 156
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 494
52% 417 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 65A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.7% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 67.2
Parallax 60.3
48% 62.1 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 54.6
Splatting 57.8
47% 57.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 334 325 322 324 306 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 955
Write 749
Mixed 487
SusWrite 332
140% 630 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 35.3
121% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 403
DQ Write 400
DQ Mixed 347
276% 383 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 114%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE800SO102408-2400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.4% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 20.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 17.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P65xHP Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Notebook P65xHP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback