Xen HVM domU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemXen HVM domU  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory21.9 GB free of 23.9961 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20181026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '18 at 11:52
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User NGA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron 6128 HE
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37% Below average
Memory 52.7
1-Core 29.2
2-Core 55.3
30% 45.7 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 234
21% 175 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xensrc PVDISK 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 61 60 62 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.7% Poor
Read 219
Write 134
Mixed 189
SusWrite 59.6
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 11.6
42% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 84.3
DQ Write 61.9
DQ Mixed 36.1
37% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 75%
Xensrc PVDISK 2TB
122GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 66 68 62 64 60 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.5% Poor
Read 224
Write 126
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 63.5
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 7.5
28% 7.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 75%
Xensrc PVDISK 1TB
829GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 27 30 29 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 55%
Xensrc PVDISK 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14% Very poor
Read 25.4
Write 19.4
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 22.7
16% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 23GB
null MHz
16384, 8188 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
27.5% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 11.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.3
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HVM domU Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Xen HVM domU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback