Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P9900  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2912-A1
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '18 at 21:11
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$212
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 138
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 355
36% 289 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.10.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 76.2
0% 48 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 57.6
Splatting 56.1
49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$33
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 190 190 190 183 186 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.1% Good
Read 247
Write 219
Mixed 198
SusWrite 189
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 31.9
98% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 174
137% 190 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$68
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 128 133 135 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 138
Write 144
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 133
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351R7BFR8C-H9 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.5% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 8.6
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO P9900 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback