Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X9DBL-3F/X9DBL-iF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9DBL-3F/X9DBL-iF  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DBL-3F/X9DBL-iF
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131206
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateApr 26 '22 at 19:59
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2407 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 115
52% 83.6 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 226
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 38
Parallax 36.4
29% 36.6 fps
MRender 41.3
Gravity 36.5
Splatting 25.9
27% 34.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$100
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 101 95 106 101 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 432
Write 439
Mixed 316
SusWrite 132
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 36.5
121% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 308
243% 338 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
106GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 104 110 109 110 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 177
Write 151
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 108
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351R7BFR8C-H9 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.3% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.3
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DBL-3F/X9DBL-iF Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9DBL-3F/X9DBL-iF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback