Intel. To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardIntel. To Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '18 at 13:41
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 151
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 458
46% 374 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.6% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 37.2
32% 35.8 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 36
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 94 56 60 55 27 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46% Average
Read 255
Write 240
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 75.2
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 20.8
82% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 90.6
DQ Mixed 145
106% 140 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
36GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 94.7
Write 97.7
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 56.5
58% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23
103GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 75 74 74 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 94
Write 92.5
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 75
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 Winbond W25X/Q32 44GB
1333, 33 MHz
8192, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.8% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical To Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel. To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $101
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback