Today's hottest deals

Huananzhi X58-RX3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardHuananzhi X58-RX3.0  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210306
Uptime42.9 Days
Run DateJul 06 '22 at 21:46
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 75
2-Core 152
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 413
42% 339 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.4% Above average
Lighting 63.6
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 63.4
52% 65.7 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 56.6
51% 62.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 240GB 240GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQBB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 18 57 131 26 102 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.6% Poor
Read 110
Write 198
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 78.6
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 7.4
43% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 15.2
DQ Mixed 16.5
13% 19.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
331GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 164 163 145 163 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 160
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 159
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GV7BMR4A-H9 HMT41GV7BMR4C-H9 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GB
1333, 1333, 33 MHz
8192, 8192, 36864 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 10
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58-RX3.0 Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Huananzhi X58-RX3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback