Huananzhi X58-RX3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardHuananzhi X58-RX3.0  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '21 at 23:52
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 168
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 501
52% 419 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Zotac(19DA 1346) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 20.6
17% 19.9 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 16.6
17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 240GB 240GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQBB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 120 109 117 25 122 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.6% Above average
Read 258
Write 242
Mixed 234
SusWrite 118
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 28.9
101% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 147
124% 180 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 93%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
426GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 156 158 160 170 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 140
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 161
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 95%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GV7BMR4A-H9 HMT41GV7BMR4C-H9 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GB
1333, 1333, 33 MHz
8192, 8192, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 14.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 24" 1280 720 SGT2482 RS24F
Typical X58-RX3.0 Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Huananzhi X58-RX3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback