Asus H81-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '18 at 05:48
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 170
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 290
36% 277 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.6% Above average
Lighting 73.5
Reflection 76
Parallax 53.9
60% 67.8 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 44.6
Splatting 37.3
33% 40.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S 120GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 43 49 48 38 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 466
Write 187
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 46.7
43% 198 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 35.5
113% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 77.8
DQ Mixed 33.3
67% 142 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 90%
Samsung HE642JJ 640GB
190GB free
Firmware: 1AA0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 32 25 21 26 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 82.3
Write 91.3
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 32
49% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron ITC 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 11.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81-PLUS Builds (Compare 855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81-PLUS - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $461
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback