Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80L0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80L0  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G50-80
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '18 at 02:13
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4030U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 87.5
1-Core 56.1
2-Core 100
53% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 148
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 390B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.28% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 0.08
Parallax 5.72
0% 1.94 fps
MRender 4.24
Gravity 2
Splatting 6.57
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.28%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 27GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 0.6 1.1 0.7 1.4 0.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.37% Terrible
Read 26.3
Write 2.3
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 1.1
7% 9.37 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 2.3
475% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.37%
Great: 103%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
5GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 0.8 1.3 1.1 1.9 1.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.02% Terrible
Read 8
Write 7.2
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 1.4
5% 4.28 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.8
81% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.02%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
32.9% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80L0 Builds (Compare 432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80L0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback