MSI B150A GAMING PRO (MS-7978)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7978
MotherboardMSI B150A GAMING PRO (MS-7978)  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '18 at 13:45
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
41.3% Average
Memory 73.7
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 128
53% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 49.3
8-Core 293
17% 171 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1330 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
49.9% Average
Lighting 60.6
Reflection 68
Parallax 90.9
49% 73.2 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 66
Splatting 55.8
51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507KC4
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 284
Write 163
Mixed 212
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 26.4
92% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 169
146% 219 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$25
167GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 134 128 130 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
71% Very good
Read 119
Write 122
Mixed 32
SusWrite 128
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$25
690GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 101 106 107 108 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 149
Write 148
Mixed 31
SusWrite 105
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 107%
StoreJet Transcend 3TB
303GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 48 48 49 47 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 20.3
Write 42
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 46.8
47% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
18% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 75%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA3 3TB
486GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 84 88 87 88 87 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.3% Below average
Read 99.7
Write 89.5
Mixed 30
SusWrite 86.6
99% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.4
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 11.6
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B150A GAMING PRO (MS-7978) Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI B150A GAMING PRO (MS-7978)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $504
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback