Fujitsu ESPRIMO C5730

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO C5730 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2804-A1
Memory	1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091105
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '16 at 14:14
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110 18,841 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.15 GHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Memory 68.2 1-Core 43 2-Core 86.9 42% 66 Pts	4-Core 89.5 8-Core 89.7 12% 89.6 Pts	64-Core 89.3 6% 89.3 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset 16,152 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 114C) 1.2GB Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.46% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.46 Parallax 0.59 0% 0.55 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 0.61 0% 0.49 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.46% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76 9,139 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 3074 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 126 (A5) Unknown 100 100 111699034509 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 36 (A8) Unknown 100 100 13 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4 (AE) Unknown 100 100 51 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 55 51 219044970541 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1481768960345 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 472 (EA) Unknown 100 100 2007 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1448 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1877 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	39.4% Below average	Read 231 Write 159 Mixed 109 37% 166 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 32 4K Mixed 11 64% 21.6 MB/s	DQ Read 25.6 DQ Write 54.5 DQ Mixed 10.9 17% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 93%
FUJITSU U3 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 85GB free, PID 2028 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 27.3 Mixed 27.9 37% 29 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.36 65% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 5 15% 5.33 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.2 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO C5730 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 19%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO C5730

CPU
Core2 Duo E7300Intel $28Bench 39%, 7,475 samples	1x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $150Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	1x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	1x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	3x

SSD
BarraCuda SSD ZA250CM10002 250GBSeagateBench 84%, 2,988 samples	1x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x

RAM
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353