Fujitsu ESPRIMO C5730

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO C5730  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2804-A1
Memory1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091105
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJul 06 '16 at 14:14
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 43
2-Core 86.9
42% 66 Pts
4-Core 89.5
8-Core 89.7
12% 89.6 Pts
64-Core 89.3
6% 89.3 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 114C) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.46% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.46
Parallax 0.59
0% 0.55 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 0.61
0% 0.49 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.4% Below average
Read 231
Write 159
Mixed 109
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 11
64% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 54.5
DQ Mixed 10.9
17% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 93%
FUJITSU U3 500GB
85GB free, PID 2028
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 27.3
Mixed 27.9
37% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.36
65% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 5
15% 5.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO C5730 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO C5730

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback