Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 28 '18 at 21:58
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 111
2-Core 220
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 718
71% 580 Pts
64-Core 843
52% 843 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.9% Average
Lighting 57
Reflection 65.8
Parallax 57.1
46% 60 fps
MRender 72.3
Gravity 55
Splatting 51.9
48% 59.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 161GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 407 413 408 315 320 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 419
Mixed 410
SusWrite 380
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 34.3
113% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 325
255% 353 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 78%
Red Hat VirtIO 2.5TB
272GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 151 153 159 156 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.2% Excellent
Read 152
Write 158
Mixed 65.4
SusWrite 154
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
186% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 88%
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB
324GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 96 97 98 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 89.1
Write 96.9
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 96.6
66% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 28.7
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback