Asrock X99 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	21.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160804
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 31 '18 at 13:38
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 3,267 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Memory 89 1-Core 99.8 2-Core 205 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 806 71% 605 Pts	64-Core 1,082 67% 1,082 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Sapphire(174B E217) 2GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.12.3 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Lighting 37.5 Reflection 34 Parallax 45.7 30% 39.1 fps	MRender 29.8 Gravity 33.2 Splatting 38.9 28% 33.9 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 240GB 8,481 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 328 359 367 314 361 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Read 451 Write 446 Mixed 313 SusWrite 356 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 91.6 4K Mixed 34.4 128% 49.8 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 149 155% 252 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 102%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB 7,666 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 28GB free Firmware: JKAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 111 110 115 119 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 117 Write 118 Mixed 58.3 SusWrite 112 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 70%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 86GB free Firmware: MJ8O SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 76 77 77 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 78.3 Write 78.8 Mixed 13.4 SusWrite 74.6 44% 61.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 89%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 91GB free Firmware: MJ8O SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 87 85 87 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 73.8 Write 96.1 Mixed 11 SusWrite 86.6 48% 66.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 89%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 69GB free Firmware: 51.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 95 101 110 94 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 108 Write 93.7 Mixed 87.1 SusWrite 96.1 71% 96.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 67%
WD WD30EURS-63SPKY0 3TB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 4GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 134 Write 128 Mixed 32.4 72% 98.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 82%
Hup72202 0APA330 2TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 104GB free Firmware: JKAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 66 63 73 76 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 106 Write 112 Mixed 62 SusWrite 70.4 64% 87.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 61%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB 1,175 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 1607 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.5 6 6.2 6.2 6 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	4.74% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 6.2 Mixed 6 SusWrite 5.8 10% 8.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.74% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 6x4GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 6 of 8 slots used 24GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	MC Read 42.5 MC Write 36.5 MC Mixed 35.5 109% 38.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 19.9 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Taichi Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Taichi

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $107Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	156x
Core i7-6850KIntel $190Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	102x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	55x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	52x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	41x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	19x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	17x

RAM
CL15-15-15 D4-2133 2x8GBUnknownBench 68%, 1,169 samples	12x
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 78%, 415 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16