Quanta JW3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemQuanta JW3  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta JW3
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색, 1024 x 600 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121124
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 03 '19 at 05:37
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 18%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 80.5
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 110
54% 85 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 282
30% 238 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 645M
Quanta(152D 1015) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9882
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
6.59% Terrible
Lighting 7.57
Reflection 6.88
Parallax 8.03
6% 7.49 fps
MRender 8.52
Gravity 8.73
Splatting 9.65
7% 8.97 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.59%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 250GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 279 168 184 151 177 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 299
Write 324
Mixed 339
SusWrite 195
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 24
81% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 205
168% 239 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 151%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
264GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 100 102 102 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 100
Mixed 52
SusWrite 101
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DM0-CK0 M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 12.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback