| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-DGS R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131001 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 03 '19 at 13:07 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 47% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
52.3%
Above average
|
52% 83.3 Pts
|
23% 170 Pts
|
11% 172 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.22
|
52.2%
Above average
|
54% 63.8 fps
|
49% 61.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 82 84 89 74 MB/s
|
36.2%
Below average
|
27% 119 MB/s
|
69% 25.5 MB/s
|
74% 93.5 MB/s
|
|
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
214GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 24 24 24 MB/s
|
17.3%
Very poor
|
19% 25.5 MB/s
|
81% 0.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.2%
Poor
|
25% 8.87 GB/s
|
23% 8.07 GB/s
|
45% 88.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 299 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 48x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 41x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 26x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 29x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 21x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |