Today's hottest deals

Asus G750JX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G750JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JX
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131118
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJul 10 '16 at 12:18
Run Duration568 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 174
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 484
50% 405 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770M
Asus(1043 213E) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6451
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 22.8
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 18
Splatting 19.3
16% 20 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 915
Write 307
Mixed 444
121% 555 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 10.7
74% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 21.2
DQ Write 60.3
DQ Mixed 9.96
16% 30.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 133%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$64
2GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 66.6
Write 68.6
Mixed 66.9
51% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 0.48
4K Mixed 0.19
58% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.6% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.4
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JX Builds (Compare 387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback