Today's hottest deals

Asus G551JM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G551JM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G551JM
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141013
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 15 '16 at 18:19
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 192
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 523
54% 436 Pts
64-Core 523
32% 523 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 185D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4256
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.16% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 16
Parallax 7.16
3% 9.1 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.3
6% 6.94 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.16%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$70
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.3% Below average
Read 246
Write 134
Mixed 88.2
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 8.73
52% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 52.6
DQ Mixed 25.4
42% 83.8 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 88%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
570GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 121
Write 119
Mixed 122
91% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.2
82% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.9
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 19.6
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G551JM Builds (Compare 399 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G551JM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback