Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2640M 12,152 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Memory 86 1-Core 91 2-Core 150 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 188 26% 190 Pts	64-Core 195 12% 195 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M 6,108 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 04A3) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.9 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	3.48% Terrible	Lighting 4.23 Reflection 5.19 Parallax 3.53 4% 4.32 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 3.09 4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.48% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate 600 240GB-$215 3,595 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: C675 SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 148 127 156 129 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 271 Write 294 Mixed 326 SusWrite 155 59% 262 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 33.5 4K Mixed 20.9 67% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 299 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 244 198% 280 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Goodram GR8GS16H5128-33 2x8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	227x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	170x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	16x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 45%, 885 samples	12x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $113

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16