bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79TO
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '19 at 15:32
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 164
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 461
44% 362 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.1% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 64.1
Parallax 62.7
48% 62.1 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 56.2
Splatting 51.9
47% 59 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 301 299 300 297 288 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 410
Mixed 402
SusWrite 304
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 40.9
130% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 315
235% 311 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 133%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
58GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 75 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 77
SusWrite 75.5
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
312GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 69 69 70 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 61.5
Write 59.2
Mixed 39
SusWrite 68.6
42% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 57%
Patriot Memory 32GB
29GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 48 49 49 49 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 155
Write 49.3
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 48.2
78% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.4
97% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4B48583231333343313144332F34475820 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback