Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111020
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 14 '19 at 16:21
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 139
66% 105 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 214
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X300/X550/X1050 Series
Asus(1043 0154) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.27
Reflection 0.96
0% 0.61 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 124 125 125 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 127
Write 128
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 119
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 88%
Mass Storage Device 250GB
8GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 24.4
Mixed 22
SusWrite 25.6
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
42% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-442.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M PRO Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $192
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback