Today's hottest deals

Asus N53SV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus N53SV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N53SV
Memory4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '19 at 13:32
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 109
52% 82.3 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 179
20% 156 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M
Asus(1043 1642) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9101
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 1.78
3% 3.24 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 4.17
Splatting 2.96
3% 4.31 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$30
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 63 67 51 57 60 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37% Below average
Read 123
Write 40.4
Mixed 144
SusWrite 66.2
21% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 13.8
55% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 102
119% 204 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 37%
Great: 82%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
60GB free
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 72 71 75 75 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 51
Mixed 40
SusWrite 71.2
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13.3
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N53SV Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N53SV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback