Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 5250

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 5250  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 5250
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110421
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 15 '18 at 21:37
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-350
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Memory 32.3
1-Core 9.8
2-Core 16.4
15% 19.5 Pts
4-Core 16.9
8-Core 16.2
2% 16.5 Pts
64-Core 18.6
1% 18.6 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310
Acer(1025 0602) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.88% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.24 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.14 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.88%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$25
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 72
Write 81.5
Mixed 76.4
58% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.22
72% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 50%
TDK LoR TF10 32GB
20GB free, PID 0619
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Read 13.2
Write 6.07
Mixed 8.22
11% 9.18 MB/s
4K Read 1.81
4K Write 0.42
4K Mixed 0.25
30% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.31% Terrible
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 3.5
8% 2.77 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 2.3
5% 1.77 GB/s
Latency 242
16% 242 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.31%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5250 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback