Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150422
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 19 '16 at 04:50
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 82.1
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 91.9
51% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 91.6
8-Core 89.1
12% 90.3 Pts
64-Core 93.5
6% 93.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7540D
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.67
Reflection 4
Parallax 3.09
3% 3.59 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 4.57
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
914GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 158
Write 148
Mixed 79.1
95% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.26
78% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3D18ADS3 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.2% Poor
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 10
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-H Builds (Compare 372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback