Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111110
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '19 at 08:28
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 93.6 2-Core 183 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 353 47% 354 Pts	64-Core 357 22% 357 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.3 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Lighting 69.5 Reflection 69.7 Parallax 86.2 57% 75.1 fps	MRender 71.1 Gravity 69.8 Splatting 57.6 53% 66.2 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89 11,245 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231706 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 208 220 219 231 211 MB/s Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.8% Good	Read 252 Write 180 Mixed 151 SusWrite 214 45% 199 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 51.3 4K Mixed 28 103% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 106 100% 156 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 89%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 13GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 102 74 92 103 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 79 Write 76.8 Mixed 55 SusWrite 95.8 56% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 60%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$39 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 26GB free Firmware: GKAOAB0A SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 55 58 56 56 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 49 Write 56.5 Mixed 33.5 SusWrite 55.5 36% 48.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AXIOM MEMORY Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.5% Above average	MC Read 17 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 16.1 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,776x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	275x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	238x

RAM
9905584-014.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 436 samples	38x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	37x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	22x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16