Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateNov 18 '22 at 07:47
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 200
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 328
41% 312 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26% Poor
Lighting 32.8
Reflection 34.7
Parallax 32.4
27% 33.3 fps
MRender 35.9
Gravity 34.3
Splatting 23.4
25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 226 228 252 254 252 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 344
Write 123
Mixed 230
SusWrite 234
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 29.9
93% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 144
112% 155 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 129%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$172
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 410 415 463 465 465 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 442
Mixed 430
SusWrite 425
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 51.8
164% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 362
271% 361 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 112%
Great: 136%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$68
923GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 119 118 119 121 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 118
Write 113
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 118
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 16.6
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,072 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $182

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $801
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback