Lenovo 4155CTO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 4155CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100305
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJul 21 '16 at 19:43
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5502
1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 73
1-Core 45.5
2-Core 67.2
42% 61.9 Pts
4-Core 71.4
8-Core 80.1
10% 75.8 Pts
64-Core 85
5% 85 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 47%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
EVGA(3842 2616) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4460
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Lighting 1.67
Reflection 1.88
Parallax 0.56
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 2%
ATI FirePro V3700 (FireGL)
Legend(17AA 1B03) 256MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.630.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.95% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 2.04
Parallax 0.66
1% 1.22 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 2.22
1% 1.46 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.95%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 0 500GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 169
Write 102
Mixed 104
93% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 3.29
4K Mixed 0.79
174% 1.56 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ21EE8BAFA-AE-E 6x2GB
6 of 12 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.2% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 11.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4155CTO Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4155CTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback