Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 5810T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire 5810T  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 5810T
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '19 at 11:54
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel U4100
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 18.7
2-Core 32.2
30% 38.6 Pts
4-Core 32.6
8-Core 34.8
4% 33.7 Pts
64-Core 36.3
2% 36.3 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 022B)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1892
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.26% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.27
Parallax 0.31
0% 0.29 fps
MRender 0.19
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 0.39
0% 0.34 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.26%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FG00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 57 56 57 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 49.9
Write 56
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 56.3
35% 47.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.M16F 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM 800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5810T Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5810T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback