Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Crucial

CT51264BF160B.M16F 1x4GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≤ Q1 2016.

Average Bench: 23.4% (132nd of 132)

Based on 87 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT51264BF160B.M16F 1x4GB
Poor: 12%Average: 23.4% Great: 34%

Popular builds with this RAM

Very poor average bench

The Crucial CT51264BF160B.M16F 1x4GB averaged 76.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 134ns
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 8.07GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT51264BF160B.M16F 1x4GB is 21.6%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Crucial CT51264BF160B.M16F 1x4GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 6GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Mixed IO Bench 6.32GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 87 samples)
Rank 13223.4%
Min Avg Max
3.68 MC Read 8.07 11.7
3.64 MC Write 7.95 11
3.24 MC Mixed 7.38 10
22.3% 7.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
1.54 SC Read 6 11
2.7 SC Write 6.72 11.7
1.04 SC Mixed 6.32 11.2
18.1% 6.35 GB/s
Min Avg Max
66.7 Latency 134 266
29.9% 134 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
25.1% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
24.4% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.2
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.5
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 295
14% 295 ns
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 4.6
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
14.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 4.5
14% 5.03 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.77 GB/s
Latency 191
21% 191 ns
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
10.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.6
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 319
13% 319 ns
87 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,288,588 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CT51264BF160B.M16F 1x4GB Builds (Compare 25,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples2,099x
Core i7-2600Intel  $173Bench 67%, 185,630 samples1,629x
Core i5-3470Intel  $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples966x
GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples1,159x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples1,093x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples850x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples460x
A400 480GBKingston  $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples441x
RAM
CT51264BF160B.M16F 1x4GBCrucialBench 23%, 87 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322

Popular CT51264BF160B.M16F 1x4GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 8 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback