Asrock H87M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	61.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H87M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130913
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '19 at 08:54
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 78.2 1-Core 110 2-Core 200 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 575 57% 466 Pts	64-Core 570 35% 570 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% XFX(1682 9587) CLim: 1580 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.1.1 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	61.5% Good	Lighting 77.2 Reflection 81.3 Parallax 108 63% 88.8 fps	MRender 76.7 Gravity 78.3 Splatting 63.8 59% 72.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 36 36 35 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 479 Write 51.3 Mixed 64 SusWrite 35.3 34% 157 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 19.9 96% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 35.1 DQ Write 38.7 DQ Mixed 17 18% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 118%
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 128GB 2,624 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 57GB free Firmware: HTRAN101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 344 285 164 184 225 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	79.6% Very good	Read 468 Write 438 Mixed 419 SusWrite 268 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 83.1 4K Mixed 39.6 133% 49.4 MB/s	DQ Read 27.5 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 42.7 39% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 760GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 204 205 204 204 204 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 149 Mixed 82.1 SusWrite 204 116% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-020.A00LF 2x4GB 230 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.2% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 7.8 25% 8.63 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 8.5 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 83.9 48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M Pro4 Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H87M Pro4 - $151

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	27x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	18x
Core i5-4670Intel $51Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	17x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	23x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	18x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	8x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	8x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C7 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 57%, 838 samples	8x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	7x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $395

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16