Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0FPV4P
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateJul 23 '16 at 19:27
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 100
2-Core 177
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 444
48% 378 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Nvidia(10DE 1151) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6822
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.6% Good
Lighting 98.9
Reflection 60.4
Parallax 105
81% 88 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 47.2
Splatting 61.7
48% 58.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 397
Write 351
Mixed 313
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 14.7
105% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 38.2
DQ Write 64.4
DQ Mixed 14.6
21% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 165
Write 148
Mixed 144
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.31
82% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston K66GKY-ETF 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 18.6
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,712 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback