HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory88.2 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180209
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 25 '19 at 00:23
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 78.7
2-Core 159
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 481
48% 394 Pts
64-Core 1,133
70% 1,133 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
6.28% Terrible
Lighting 7.23
Reflection 8.96
Parallax 6.28
6% 7.49 fps
MRender 9.57
Gravity 7.83
Splatting 8.48
7% 8.63 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.28%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 233 232 227 227 227 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.9% Good
Read 232
Write 227
Mixed 228
SusWrite 230
52% 229 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 30.4
101% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 183
143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 125%
WD Re 2TB-$38
2TB free
Firmware: 1D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 136 137 137 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 123
Write 126
Mixed 104
SusWrite 136
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965516-001.B00LF 12x8GB
12 of 12 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 31
96% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback