Today's hottest deals

Apple iMacPro1,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemApple iMacPro1,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-7BA5B2D9E42DDD94
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '19 at 12:06
Run Duration77 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2140B
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 226
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 718
69% 569 Pts
64-Core 1,385
86% 1,385 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Apple(106B 017C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 786 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Lighting 115
Reflection 75.6
Parallax 155
94% 115 fps
MRender 74.9
Gravity 111
Splatting 108
82% 98.1 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 90%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP1024 1TB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 177.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1911
Write 2,197
Mixed 1,836
444% 1,981 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 135
325% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 952
DQ Write 519
DQ Mixed 632
498% 701 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 46
MC Write 48.2
MC Mixed 39.6
127% 44.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 112%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMacPro1,1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: Apple iMacPro1,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 142% - Outstanding Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback