Apple MacBookPro16,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive11.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacBookPro16,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E1008331FDC96864
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3584 x 2240 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '23 at 18:51
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 68.8
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 119
51% 83.4 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 416
36% 307 Pts
64-Core 693
43% 693 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 95%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP1024 1TB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 130
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 64 57 74 51 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 122
Write 305
Mixed 70
SusWrite 62.9
32% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 2.9
8% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
53.7% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 18.4
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 245
16% 245 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 14 5 64 0" 1280 720
Typical MacBookPro16,1 Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Apple MacBookPro16,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback