Today's hottest deals

Asus TW100-E5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TW100-E5  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek P5N-VM WS
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '19 at 14:20
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 62
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 78.2
39% 60.1 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 146
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400
Asus(1043 8379) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.12% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 2.12
Parallax 0.28
1% 1.21 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.78
1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.12%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM4OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 71 81 78 79 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 36.8
Write 50.6
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 74.1
36% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 51%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
6GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
9.26% Terrible
Read 23.7
Write 9.7
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 11.2
16% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.26%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB 0h DDR2
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 3.3
12% 4.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback