Today's hottest deals

Asrock J3455M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock J3455M  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181127
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 30 '19 at 09:15
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3455
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 44.9
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 88.4
35% 59.5 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 172
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
ASRock(1849 5A85) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.26% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 2.81
Parallax 2.16
2% 2.48 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.04
3% 3.26 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.26%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
901GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 90 129 141 142 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 156
Write 140
Mixed 89.1
SusWrite 126
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unde TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.1% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical J3455M Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J3455M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $371WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback