Today's hottest deals

Asrock J3455M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock J3455M  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20161216
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 09 '24 at 13:04
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3455
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
26.2% Poor
Memory 27.2
1-Core 40.2
2-Core 78.3
27% 48.6 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 146
20% 146 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
ASRock(1849 5A85) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.83% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 2.3
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 0.3
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.83%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 66 60 53 56 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 364
Write 358
Mixed 285
SusWrite 82.4
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 21.8
4K Mixed 7.2
42% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 82
71% 106 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 82%
SSDPR-CX400-128-G2 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 312 314 333 331 211 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 332
Write 284
Mixed 303
SusWrite 306
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 20
71% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 97.8
79% 112 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unde TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 271
15% 271 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 30 60 27" 1280 720 MSI40A8 MSI MP271CA
Typical J3455M Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J3455M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $371WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback