Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN515-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Freed_CFS
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 30 '19 at 10:11
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 247
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 678
72% 574 Pts
64-Core 800
50% 800 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1264) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.93% Terrible
Lighting 7.17
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 6.72
6% 13.5 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 6.53
Splatting 14.5
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.93%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 89 22 30 8.6 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 416
Write 339
Mixed 196
SusWrite 53.6
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 16.3
50% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 79.7
DQ Write 76.7
DQ Mixed 39.1
40% 65.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 55%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
800GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 133 131 133 134 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 146
Write 145
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 132
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.6
244% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 8502 PSD44G240082S 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.7% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 15
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 18.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-52 Builds (Compare 5,687 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback