Gigabyte GA-H97M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics90.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150803
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '19 at 17:00
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 184
76% 128 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 539
56% 450 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.3% Outstanding
Lighting 111
Reflection 107
Parallax 104
90% 107 fps
MRender 148
Gravity 110
Splatting 85.9
90% 115 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 111 99 128 151 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 129
Write 150
Mixed 99.3
SusWrite 118
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
251GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.5 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.49% Terrible
Read 1.3
Write 0.2
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.4
0% 0.6 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 0.49%
Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
130GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 139 140 140 142 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 143
Write 141
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 140
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
36GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 45 31 52 60 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 80
Write 77.5
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 47
43% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 67%
Generic UDISK 34GB
19GB free, PID 1320
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.1 3.3 3 3.1 3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.79% Terrible
Read 7.3
Write 1
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 3.1
5% 3.93 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
43% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.79%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.7% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97M-D3H Builds (Compare 2,167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97M-D3H - $84

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $334
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback