Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu LIFEBOOK A530

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK A530  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB06
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '19 at 20:25
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium P6100
On Board, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 63.3
1-Core 50.2
2-Core 98.2
44% 70.6 Pts
4-Core 98.7
8-Core 100
13% 99.4 Pts
64-Core 98.9
6% 98.9 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 150A) 730MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2025
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.81
1% 0.87 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.22
1% 0.89 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$41
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 184 188 178 217 219 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.6% Above average
Read 232
Write 223
Mixed 219
SusWrite 198
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 18.6
72% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 184
144% 198 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 125%
USB Flash Memory 1GB
1GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 4
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.5
7% 5.72 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM 15h Reserved 667 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
20.8% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK A530 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK A530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $192
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback