Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP NOTEBOOK 15-AC152SA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP NOTEBOOK 15-AC152SA NOTEBOOK (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 80C3
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '18 at 21:01
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	NGA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4210U 82,966 User benchmarks, average bench 41% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 84 1-Core 72.5 2-Core 132 59% 96.3 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 188 25% 188 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 80C3) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	3.01% Terrible	Lighting 3.37 Reflection 3.69 Parallax 4.72 3% 3.93 fps	MRender 3.76 Gravity 2.03 Splatting 6.35 4% 4.05 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.01% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB 71,657 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: RDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 75 81 86 77 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 42.8 Write 92.5 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 77.9 48% 65.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 109% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 67%
USB Flash Memory 1GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.7 6.7 6.6 6.6 6.7 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	5.75% Terrible	Read 19.3 Write 6.5 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 6.6 11% 9.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 24% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.75% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB 44,908 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	29.2% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 8.5 27% 9.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 8.4 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $285	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback