Today's hottest deals

MSI H77MA-G43 (MS-7756)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7756
MotherboardMSI H77MA-G43 (MS-7756)  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131029
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '19 at 22:04
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 96
2-Core 189
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 369
49% 369 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
MSI(1462 2877) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 24
Parallax 31.7
20% 26.8 fps
MRender 32.5
Gravity 29.2
Splatting 25
23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$30
56GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 203 199 206 203 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 484
Write 200
Mixed 209
SusWrite 202
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 12.8
110% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 72.5
81% 133 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 78%
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 69 68 69 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 230
Write 82
Mixed 128
SusWrite 69.1
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 31.7
119% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 99.3
DQ Write 76.5
DQ Mixed 90.5
67% 88.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1TB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 131 143 137 142 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 147
Write 150
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 139
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST3250823A 239GB
120GB free
Firmware: 3.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.9 3.9 3.9 4 3.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.27% Terrible
Read 3.8
Write 3
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 3.8
3% 3.53 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.27%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT25664BA1339.D8FE Transcend JM1333KLH-4G 859B CT25664BA1339.D8FE 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77MA-G43 (MS-7756) Builds (Compare 515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI H77MA-G43 (MS-7756)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback