Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Memory 83.3 1-Core 61.8 2-Core 113 55% 86.1 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 265 30% 232 Pts	64-Core 275 17% 275 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 62%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% PNY(196E 1119) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	3.59% Terrible	Lighting 3.33 Reflection 4.35 Parallax 5.19 3% 4.29 fps	MRender 4.29 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 7.26 5% 6.28 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.59% Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.6% Poor	Lighting 34.8 Reflection 28.5 Parallax 28.3 28% 30.5 fps	MRender 39.3 Gravity 39.9 Splatting 38.2 32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3512G 512GB 19,948 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6104000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 106 85 69 55 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 312 Write 153 Mixed 77.4 SusWrite 87.7 35% 157 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 32 4K Mixed 16.4 70% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 58.3 DQ Mixed 24 41% 82.2 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 119%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55 14,577 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 262GB free Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 77 78 78 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 77.1 Write 76.2 Mixed 40.7 SusWrite 77.3 50% 67.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0- BLS8G3D1609DS Hynix DMT351E6EFR8C 24GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 800, 800, 667, 800 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.2% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 13.8 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 10.3 26% 9.17 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 43%, 4,751 samples	20x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	17x
F3 DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 41%, 3,080 samples	11x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $435

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16